Showing posts with label baseball. Show all posts
Showing posts with label baseball. Show all posts

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Citi-Field

I was pre-disposed to not like the new Citi-Field. The reason was this: I couldn't be more tired of the fashionable baseball stadium as museum to, or better -- mausoleum of, a game that people used to enjoy. Obviously Baseball's rich history and grand tradition is something that differentiates it, and that Major League Baseball is wise to market, but in too heavy a dose it sucks the life out of the game.

Having gone to my first game there, there were certainly things I liked. I liked the fact that the stadium is physically on the street. With any luck, auto-body row will, over the next few years, be replaced by bars and restaurants. I liked the vertical-ness of the stadium. The upper decks are far more on top of the field then they were. Finally, the expansiveness and openness of the vending areas is pleasant and smart.

One of the things the new Yankee Stadium, I'm told, does wonderfully is that it feels very much like the old Yankee Stadium. There was no attempt at that with Citi-Field. Instead, it is supposed to feel like the old Ebbets field. Having the Jackie Robinson Rotunda as the centerpiece no doubt strengthens that feeling. The Mets, themselves, of course, never played in Ebbets field and Jackie Robinson never played for the Mets. The architecture is less a homage to the Mets, or even the Dodgers, then to the self-indulgent owner of the Mets, who, evidently, grew up a Dodger fan.

The most off-putting influence on citi-field is the Phillie's Citizens Bank Park. While there are many nice features of CBP which could have sensibly been imitated, the Green (seats) and Maroon (usher's uniforms) color scheme was emphatically not one of them.

Symbolically, perhaps, the most disheartening feature was the short shrift the scoreboard got. Three quarters of the space is taken by ads. More space was alloted to a Chevy ad then to out of town scores, lineups, current batters stats, etc combined. A good chunk of the stadium has no view of either the (tiny) scoreboard or the jumbotron.

In sum, to go to Citifield is to be reminded of the disregard in which the Mets hold their fans.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

K-Rod

If one considers BAa, OPS and K/BB to be far better measures of a relievers worth then ERA or Saves, then I am not sure the mets wouldnt be better of with, for the same money, 3 of Hoffman, Fuentes, Springer, Saito and Rhodes instead of K-Rod.

Look at the numbers:
K-Rod Righty 26 3-year, $37M
SEASON TEAM TBF K/9 K/BB AVG OBP SLG OPS
2006 LAA 296 12.08 3.5 0.197 0.276 0.333 0.607
2007 LAA 285 12.03 2.65 0.204 0.299 0.306 0.604
2008 LAA 288 10.14 2.27 0.216 0.314 0.316 0.629
Putz Righty 31 1-year 5.5M
2006 Sea 303 11.95 8 0.207 0.245 0.284 0.528
2007 Sea 260 10.3 6.31 0.153 0.202 0.252 0.452
2008 Sea 211 10.88 2 0.256 0.36 0.389 0.749
Fuentes Lefty 33 2008: $5M
2006 Col 274 10.06 2.81 0.209 0.301 0.372 0.672
2007 Col 255 8.22 2.44 0.206 0.299 0.323 0.621
2008 Col 256 11.78 3.73 0.205 0.277 0.293 0.566
Wood Righty 31 2-year, $20.5M
2006 ChC 86 5.95 1.63 0.253 0.326 0.52 0.846
2007 ChC 101 8.88 1.85 0.207 0.31 0.299 0.606
2008 ChC 276 11.4 4.67 0.219 0.288 0.344 0.63
Hoffman Righty 41 2008: $7.5M
2006 SD 248 7.14 3.85 0.205 0.25 0.316 0.566
2007 SD 235 6.91 2.93 0.228 0.276 0.358 0.63
2008 SD 180 9.13 5.11 0.224 0.263 0.394 0.655
Springer Righty 40 2008: $3.5M
2006 Hou 240 6.94 2.88 0.211 0.277 0.394 0.669
2007 StL 257 9 3.47 0.181 0.248 0.265 0.511
2008 StL 205 8.05 2.5 0.212 0.286 0.31 0.593
Rhodes Lefty 39 2-year, $4M
2005 Cle 175 8.93 3.58 0.206 0.263 0.269 0.532
2006 Phi 214 9.46 1.6 0.261 0.376 0.383 0.757
2008 -- 146 10.19 2.5 0.224 0.31 0.256 0.557
Saito Righty 38 2008: $2M
2006 LA 303 12.29 4.65 0.177 0.243 0.262 0.503
2007 LA 234 10.91 6 0.151 0.209 0.239 0.448
2008 LA 197 11.49 3.75 0.226 0.294 0.299 0.594


Also scary, having lived through Wagner and Benitez who where great regular season closers that could be counted on to blow playoff games, is K-Rod's recent postseason performance.

Finally, the Mets do not really need another immature 26 year old on their roster. Adding a nucleus of steady veteran hands might go a long way towards avoiding yet another september meltdown.